Advertisement

Tag Archive for 'msnbc'

This Article Totally Gave Me The Glees

There is a fabulous article at American Thinker about Keith Olbermann.

You’ve probably all heard about how Fox News is the most trusted news source now, and how it’s absolutely slaughtering the other cable news shows in the ratings. I mean, that’s no surprise, really.  MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann allows blowhards like Janeane Garafalo onto his program and treats her as an authority of some sort. It’s no wonder that viewers are tuning out at warp speed.   Apparently, the National Review asked this week, “At what point does MSNBC pull the plug on its all-Left format?”

That’s a great question.  My guess is that, like Obama and his administration, MSNBC will simply ignore what’s happening before their very eyes, and continue on a path of destruction, regardless of whether that destruction is self-imposed.

According to the article, Olbermann’s audience is now a paltry 20% of Bill O’Reilly’s.  Ouch.  The article’s author speculates that Keith’s decline is due in part to his disdain for women.  He’s positively horrid to women with whom he disagrees.  He called Michelle Malkin a “big mashed up bag of meat with liptstick.”  He referred to Sarah Palin as a “moronic Bush in a skirt.” And apparently, Keith is totally sucktastic with women on a personal level too.  This was news to me.  Not that I expected otherwise, mind you, but I’ve never cared enough about Keith Olbermann to find out what his personal life was all about. It turns out, in addition to having well-publicized trouble with his own mother, Keith can’t manage to score a second date with anyone, except his most recent conquest, a 25 year old girl whose on-air job at NBC he arranged.  I’m sure she’s with him for his great personality, though (snort).

Keith is 51 and has never been married.  And whether or not that’s the reason, Keith is always furious.  Have you noticed that?  He’s in a constant state of rage. New Yorker magazines even titled a write-up about him “One Angry Man.”

I find his rage amusing.  Especially because instead of taking stock and trying to LEARN from his plummeting ratings, he and the rest of the rabid rage-filled “journalists” at MSNBC will more than likely continue to do exactly what they’re doing.

I guess it’s true that everyone likes to watch a good train wreck.

You Know What I Think Is Kind Of Hilarious?

The lovefest for Obama that we’ve witnessed over the past year. Behold a nice little recap of that lovefest here:

And now? A little over a year later? ABC’s Jake Tapper is asking why in the heck Obama can’t “man up” and make tough, presidential-type decisions.

You know, I’m not exactly sure about this, but I think, in his own little way, Mr. Tapper just questioned whether or not the President has Actual Testicles. Yep.

Wow….what a difference a year, an inflamed ego, absolutely zero experience whatsoever, broken promises galore and a raging deficit can make, huh?

Sen. Judd Gregg Puts The Smack Down On Two Snippy MSNBC Reporters

These chicks act like junior high girls who just got blown off by the quarterback. Wow.

Senator Judd Gregg is awesome in this, because he’s specific and pointed and clear, even while these women get all huffy at him.

LOVE.

Andrew Breitbart Is A Freaking BADASS, And I Officially Have A Crush On Him.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

He WIPES THE FLOOR with that pansy, David Schuster, in this MSNBC interview. You guys have to read the history behind this interview.

It’s amazing to me how liberals are jumping with glee over the O’Keefe arrest, and yet still to this DAY try to defend ACORN’s behavior in the bust which O’Keefe brought to the attention of the nation.

David Shuster is out of control. Just look at his tweets in the source link. GAWD.

Even More Implosive In-Fighting For Your Monday Morning Enjoyment…

Compliments of Brietbart.tv, here’s some more liberal in-fighting to make you feel all warm and fuzzy on a Monday morning.

It’s like watching more chimpanzees fling their crap at each other. Comic GOLD.

Hey Everyone! Here’s A Great Idea!

When you have a large piece of poo, in order to make the poo more appealing, you should clearly cut the piece of poo into smaller, more tolerable (and therefore, more appealing) pieces of poo.

Yeah. That should work, genius.

And, is this guy drunk? Just curious, because he sounds an awful lot like Peter Griffin after a long night at the Drunken Clam. Wow.

Obama Misses A Great Opportunity

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

Here’s the thing, Barack. You can’t act all smug and say, “It’s not something I’m losing a lot of sleep over” AND imply that Fox News is nothing more than talk radio in the same interview. You can either say, “You know what? Who am I to determine who’s a legitimate news organization and who isn’t? The fact of the matter is, as the POTUS, I’m willing to sit down with anyone to debate and discuss the issues of importance to the American people,” OR you can perpetuate the nonsense being spewed by your staff. You can’t really have it both ways. Either it’s a big deal to you (and you’ll say things like “it’s operating as talk radio”) or it isn’t (and you’ll find your testicular fortitude and do a show with Chris Wallace).

I will give the MSNBC interviewer credit for not just giving him a pass with the whole, “The American people care a lot more about more pressing issues” BS. She forced him to answer, and I appreciate that. But he missed out on a great opportunity to put this war to rest and act, you know, PRESIDENTIAL for once.

You Know You Suck When Helen Thomas Tells You To Shut Your Yapper

Seriously, Bo. You’re a Democrat. And Helen Thomas – champion of the Democrat Presidents – is telling you to shut it already. Here’s a thought – your ego may want to take just a wee bit of a vacation at this point. If this permanent statue in the press room is telling you to back off of going after news media when you’re the PRESIDENT OF THE FREAKIN UNITED STATES and have maybe just two or three other things you should be doing, you may want to take heed. Way to instill confidence in the American people – half of which disagree with pretty much everything that already has come out of your gaping piehole.

And, can someone tell me what purpose this MSNBC blond chick has? I’m assuming she’s mute? Or just really, really overstimulated by the studio lights? I’d just like to point out that she’s getting a paycheck for that. Wow.

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

Obama Continues To Be Terrified Of Fox News

2009-10-12_091300

The New York Times has an interesting update on the never-ending spat between the White House and The Fox News Channel (FNC).

The White House communications director, Anita Dunn, said this weekend, ”We’re going to treat them the way we would treat an opponent.  As they are undertaking a war against Barack Obama and the White House, we don’t need to pretend that this is the way that legitimate news organizations behave.”

Wow.  Is there any wonder why Chris Wallace said, after being rebuffed during Obama’s news show extravaganzathon a few weeks ago, that Obama’s administration was ”the biggest bunch of crybabies I have dealt with in my 30 years in Washington”? I mean, COME ON.  You cannot, with any credibility, say that, for example,  MSNBC is “a legitimate news organization” and then claim otherwise about FNC.  You just can’t.

Here’s the thing.  Whenever the White House gets its panties in a twist over FNC, the FNC ratings skyrocket.  So it’s not like FNC is freaking out over this or anything.  In fact, I would submit to you that they’re kind of reveling in it a little, which, honestly, they SHOULD.  Obama’s giving them all sorts of clout and power by claiming that they have none, and he looks foolish to avoid them, and by extension the millions of Americans who watch them.

It’s kind of cutting off your nose to spite your face, really.  If you want to change the minds or convince or sway people to believe in you and your policies, isn’t it kind of a good idea to use a platform which REACHES the people you’re trying to sway?

MSNBC = Classy

So NOW, in addition to being racists and unAmerican and astroturf and whatever else the liberal Democrats have called people who don’t agree with Obama’s healthcare plans, we apparently are just trying to “take down Obama” even if it means “half the country dies.”

Wow. Half the country is going to die if Obama’s healthcare legislation doesn’t pass, you guys. Has someone alerted all the doctors in white labcoats who were invited on the White House lawn today? Because that’s kind of a big deal.

Now – the Olympics thing. Here’s my take on it, because I know you’ve been DYING TO KNOW what I think. I think it’s actually really cool for South America that they’re getting to host for the first time. Do I feel kinda bad that the US is going to miss out? Yeah – I do. It’s a loss for the country. And I cringe a little, frankly, at all the coverage I see of people CHEERING that Chicago lost, but I do understand it. Obama and Michelle made this Olympic fight about them, and that wasn’t cool. People reacted negatively to that, because they are still annoyed that this is the same guy who’s been running all over the world to apologize for the very country which he was ostensibly trying to “sell.” So when he and Michelle ran off to Copenhagen to offer their self-promoting, self-important, self-serving speeches on how important it was to THEM to have the Olympics in their hometown…well, that kiiiinda made people want to root against them. THEM, mind you. Not Chicago.

So yeah – I can sorta understand the cheering, even if I’m not in the cheering crowd.

Check this article out for more perspective – great read!

MSNBC Reeeeally Wants Healthcare Protests To Be About Race, So They Ignore Reality To Prove Their Point.

BEHOLD: A group of MSNBC “journalists” whining that people bringing weapons to healthcare protests are racially motivated. They go on and on about how this is just proof positive that people don’t like Obama because he’s black, and that basically any second, someone’s going to try to assassinate him for it. Notice the footage they use of the man carrying the weapons.

Here’s what they didn’t want you to see:

2009-08-21_085427

2009-08-21_085418

Seriously, MSNBC. Do you not realize that you’re going to get caught when you edit your footage like this? I mean, I get that you want everything to be about race, but the reality is, it’s just not.

Now – do I think carrying assault weapons to protest rallies is a good way to demonstrate opposition? No. I think it’s just totally over the top and unnecessarily provocative, regardless of whether or not it’s legal. But the fact of the matter is, it IS legal, and this BLACK MAN has every right to do it.

It’s just that MSNBC doesn’t want you to KNOW he’s black, because it sort of ruins their whole cry-fest.

It’s Still OK To Call Republican Women Names, According to MSNBC

Here’s some MSNBC dude (no, I don’t know his name) spewing a bunch of crap out of his gaping piehole (I was going to say hate speech, but I’m assuming that only applies when Fox does it about Democrats) about Minnesota Congresswoman Michele Bachmann.   At first, I thought he was a sportscaster that had run amok, but I think he’s actually a newscaster.  I can’t be sure.

What I find REALLY interesting about this spew is that it’s incomplete. There’s absolutely no mention of ACORN in it, which may have a heavy hand in the Census. Oh, and our President was affiliated with them before he was elected and all.  Go figure.

The questions the Census is now asking may very well be not Constitutional.  I will honestly say that I don’t know if they are or are not for sure, but I really don’t see how Congresswoman Buchmann not rolling over for the Messiah Obama and his ACORN cronies that may now be responsible for manipulating taking the census is a bad thing. Why, you ask?  Well, since when does government say “jump” and we say “how high?”  Since when are we not allowed to question the motives of said government?  Since when should ACORN have a hand in the damn Census?  Seriously. 

This article has some better audio that gives Congresswoman Bachmann’s side of the story, rather than just having a label of “Illegally Insane” under her picture on such a reputable pillar of journalistic prowess. I suggest if you want to hear what she meant by her refusal to fill out all of the information on her census form, the audio may be more substantial for you to check out and judge for yourself. 

Stay classy, MSNBC.

I Want To Mock This…

…but frankly it’s too creepy to mock.

BEHOLD: Evan Thomas, Newsweek Editor, chatting with MSNBC’s Chris “Thrill Up My Leg” Matthews. Listen to Evan Thomas claim that Reagan was “all about America” like it was a bad thing. And then, listen as Evan Thomas says that Obama is “standing above the country, above the world – he’s sort of…God.”

I’m not making this up, you guys. I’ve actually heard liberals scoff at conservatives who claim that too many people worship and deify Obama like he’s the Messiah. They think we’re overreacting, you see.

Yeah.

I don’t think we’re overreacting.

Attention America: It’s Inexcusable To Be Disrespectful To Women – Unless They Are Conservative, Of Course

chris-matthews2

You know what I hate? That liberals get to DECIDE what’s offensive. Janeane Garahatemonger spews a bunch of nonsense on a mainstream program about how I’m a huge redneck racist with Stockholm Syndrome, and this is O.K. to air.  Because she’s a liberal, after all, and she’s talking about conservative people – who obviously fall into a different category when it comes to being slung a giant pile of flaming poo.    If I held my breath to wait for an apology for that one, well, you get the point.

Jeff Poor and Colleen Raezler did an interesting piece on Culture and Media Institute’s site about how there’s a blatant double-standard when it comes to the way the media addresses liberal women as opposed to conservative women. It all started from a February 7, 2008 MSNBC program, where David Shuster said something about Chelsea Clinton and how she was being “pimped out” by her Mom, Hillary, during her presidential campaign.

Well, NOW and some other groups got all offended by this, claiming it was disrespectful, yadda yadda yadda. So, the network gave an apology and suspended the guy for doing it.

So, fast forward from that grave day in 2008 and let’s look at the highlights pointed out by Poor and Raezler:

  • On March 27, 2009,Hardball” host Chris Matthews called Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn) “the Mata Hari of Minnesota” for her efforts in the House to statutorily defend the U.S. Dollar.”
  • “Florida’s Katharine Harris was called ‘Cruella De Vil’”
  • Elisabeth Hasselbeck has been referred to as “blond and witchy”
  • Ann Coulter has been called, well, lots of things that I don’t think I can type here without being filtered.
  • Sarah Palin – holy crap, this one should get its own chapter in this book of namecalling.  For starters, Keith Olbermann referred to Palin as “‘fire breather’ during a rant on his August 29, 2008 “Countdown” program. Of her stance on issues, he stated, “she’s this side of ‘melt the Arctic,’ this side of ‘imprison abortionists,’ she’s run up the debt, ‘purge the lefties’ fire breather.”  Chris Matthews referred to her as “John McCain’s Girl Friday” and a “dolt.”  And, then there was that whole incident when Obama used Palin’s “lipstick on a pitbull” reference and twisted it to fit his own jab, saying “lipstick on a pig” when talking about Palin’s policies.

The big takeaway for me from this article?

“MSNBC has now compared outspoken conservative women to a dog, a dragon, an exotic dancer, a mail-order bride, and implied that a female governor and vice-presidential candidate carried less weight on the ticket than her male counterpart.”

Honestly, you can just read that paragraph alone, and if it doesn’t irritate the hell out of you as an intelligent American female, then, um, you’re probably a liberal American female. 

I can’t believe women, as a collective group, are allowing jerks like Chris Matthews and Keith Olbermann to spew a bunch of sexist crap out of their pieholes against anyone, really.  Liberal OR conservative. 

Feminism, shmeninism.  Nice job of setting our gender back about 100 years….really.

Rush, Facebook, And Feelings

 

You are all probably clever and competent enough to know that Rush Limbaugh headlined the CPAC meeting yesterday.  And one thing in particular stood out for me in his speech:

“There are certain realities. We don’t have the votes in Capitol Hill to stop what’s going to happen. What we can do is slow it down…and do the best we can to inform the American people of what’s really on the horizon. I know it’s going to be tough.  At some points, I don’t think it can happen even right now. This is still the honeymoon period, and there’s a lot of devotion to the Obama administration. It doesn’t have anything to do with intellectual thinking, it’s feelings.”

You know, this is absolutely right.  Very rarely do I come across an Obama supporter who doesn’t get all gooey and emotional when they talk about him.  Look at that buffoon on MSNBC Chris Matthews as an example.  He said, “I have to tell you, you know, it’s part of reporting this case, this election, the feeling most people get when they hear Barack Obama’s speech. My, I felt this thrill going up my leg. I mean, I don’t have that too often.”

Obama has a gift.  He is a brilliant orator, uniquely capable of arousing waves of emotion from his audiences.  I was on Facebook the night of his state of the union address, and saw a comment thread from some folks to whom I’m connected.  It went like this:

Girl One:  I just LOVE Obama!
Girl Two:  I have such a girly crush on our Mr. Pres…Inspiring!
Girl One:  OMGosh so do I…is that wrong?  ;)
Girl Three:  Me too me too me too!!

You see?  It’s all emotional.  It’s all sapped out and gooey.  It’s not rational, or sensible, or practical, or even remotely about about actual content of the speeches. Obama’s success has been due in large part to the way he makes people feel.  And this is precisely the challenge that conservatives face in the next election cycles.  We need representation which can touch the hearts of the constituents like Obama clearly does, only actually make sense, which Obama clearly does not.