Tag Archive for 'michelle obama'

Hi. It’s Daisy Here. I’m In Philly. And, I’m Feeling Particularly Snarky (That’s Warning One)

As Mock told you in a previous entry, I’m in Philadelphia on business most of this week, bringing home the proverbial bacon, frying it up in a pan, and all that stuff. I think I’ve been to Philly before, but I believe I was a wee tot, so I don’t remember it, and I obviously didn’t understand the historical significance of the place.

I ate dinner at Carpenters’ Hall last night, which is known best for being the place where the first Continental Congress was hosted in 1774. It’s quite the beautiful little building. While gnawing on a lamb chop, I realized that I was in a room rich with history. I looked around and soaked in the fact that there were a lot of really important people that sat exactly where I was sitting. People who basically had a huge hand in creating our awesome country. And then I realized that life is short. So despite me being all worky-worky since I flew into town, I fully intend to get my butt on some sort of tour this evening – even if that equates to me harassing a local to show me some cool crap. Fingers are crossed. Stay tuned.

In the meantime, my Internet connection BLOWS, and technological aspects of my life have been frustrating these past few days, to say the least. So THANK YOU to my partner in crime, Mock, for holding down the fort while I deal with men in suits. And crappy connections.

This all adds to my already present sense of snarkiness, naturally. (That was Warning Number Two.) And so, when I read an article on the continued vacationing of the Obamas in Martha’s Vineyard, I was already a little annoyed. Then I saw this picture, and I think my reaction was WHIZZAH WHUZZAH?

What in the hell is up with FLOTUS’ shirt?

Seriously. If I’ve said it once, I’ve said it a thousand times. With all the money they throw around, could she not hire a stylist? Or, I don’t know, just take a gander in the mirror or something. If I’m not mistaken, I think I just heard Jackie Kennedy roll over in her grave.

GAWD.

You can now resume your normal activities. That is all.

??

I read this article with confusion. It says that a new exhibit at the Smithsonian, called “Americans Now,” is featuring a portrait of Michelle Obama, along with other celebrities like Tom Hanks and LL Cool J.

I would have thought FOR SURE Michelle would have gotten her very own exhibit. But instead, she’s having to share space with other celebrities. HORRORS.

If you’re in DC, you can bow down to check out Michelle’s portrait through July of 2011.

Or, you know, you can just look at this one:

Your call.

Your Sunday Snark

A clever and competent reader sent me this photo of two first ladies stepping off of Air Force One.

I don’t think the photo requires any more clarification than that. Simply compare and contrast, and remember which of these women is constantly referred to by the MSM as a fashion icon.

Michelle Obama And “Increasing Intensity”

You know what would be awesome? If instead of encouraging, IN THE NAME OF OUR FOUNDERS NO LESS, people to “increase their intensity” with respect to racial inequalities, Michelle would address the New Black Panther comments. Or denounce the NAACP’s despicable response to the Kenneth Gladney assault. Or NOT accuse the Tea Party of being racist.

That’d be awesome.

It’s Friday. I’m Feeling Extra-Snarky. You’ve Been Warned.

Mock just sent this picture to me. It was taken this past weekend on the way back from the big O’s Memorial Day festivities (you know, the one where he didn’t go to Arlington and got rained out at some other cemetery that, you guessed it – wasn’t Arlington and all).

My gut response to the picture was, “WWJD?” (What Would Jackie Do?)

She would not do this:

Three things:

1. Get a stylist.
2. If you refuse to get a stylist, you may want to consider glasses and/or contacts.
2. For the love of everything that’s holy, invest in a thong.

That is all.

Hey Federal Government? Your Butt Looks Fat In Those Jeans.

You know who could stand to shed several hundred pounds? The government. My mom sent me Mona Charen’s latest article, and it’s a good thing she did, because it had been at least 2 or 3 days since she gave me an article about something, and I was starting to worry. My mom is Article Queen – and if I don’t have at least an inch-thick pile of stuff to read from her at any given moment – about why vegetables are good for you or how to save on heating costs, then I’d be really concerned.

ANYWAY.

I read Mona’s article and was struck right away by this point: “No problem that the federal government undertakes to tackle can ever be recognized as solved because to do so would mean the dissolution of an agency. And if the federal program creates new problems, well, those are then excuses for new agencies.”

Ain’t that the truth?

A prime example of this is Michelle Obama’s new campaign to tackle obesity. Presumably, Michelle’s got herself a nice big staff of folks dedicating their days to this issue, at taxpayer expense. This bunch of fat-fighting folk have already suggested taxes on unhealthy foods, subsidies for healthy foods, etc.

But here’s the thing. The amount of money currently spent by the federal government on nutritional programs for kids is unbelievable. According to Mona’s article, one out of every EIGHT adults now gets food stamps, along with a QUARTER of all kids. Over HALF of all infants are on the WIC program. Plus, more children get free or reduced-price school lunches than those whose parents pay full price.

A bit of history, courtesy of Mona. The WIC was started in 1972 for the purpose of providing food, nutrition counseling and other services for poor expectant mothers and their kids (up to age 5). Five years after its inception, the program covered 4% of women and kids and 6% of newborns. By 2006, those figures were up to 30% of women, 51% of newborns, and 25% of kids. And the trend is going to continue, because there are few controls over the program, AND it continues to get big raises from the government. At the same time, eligibility standards are getting lower and lower, such that by 2006, only about half of families taking advantage of WIC were at or below the poverty line.

And what’s happened to the nation’s nutrition and health over that same period of time? Well, whaddya know. Obesity is seriously on the rise, and the folks most likely to be obese are precisely those who are eligible for federal nutrition programs. Hello.

So what’s the Obama solution? Throw more taxpayer money at nutrition and food programs. Yeah- that oughta work. I won’t be surprised if our tax dollars soon go towards funding exercise equipment for WIC/food stamp recipients. Or lapband surgery. I mean, we can’t expect them to make lifestyle changes without help, right? And now that there is an obesity taskforce, there will ALWAYS be an obesity taskforce, and the problem will never ever ever go away. But by golly, those fat-fighting folk will have job security.

Our government is way too fat, and it’s too far gone for a simple diet/exercise solution. We need to do some serious bariatric surgery on the government.

Ugh.

Um, FLOTUS? Your Hypocrisy Is Showing.

You know that whole anti-fast-food crusade that FLOTUS has been leading this year? Her tireless fight against processed and fat-laden meals? Her knowing what’s best for YOU to shovel into your piehole?

Well it turns out that she’s actually profited from such obscene cuisine. THE HORROR.

Courtesy of michellemalkin.com, In June 2005, a few months after her husband was elected to the U.S. Senate, Mrs. Obama hustled a seat on the corporate Board of Directors of TreeHouse Foods, Inc. Despite zero experience, the food-processing company put her on its audit and nominating and corporate governance committees. For her on-the-job training and the privilege of putting her name and face on their literature, the company forked over $45,000 in 2005 and $51,200 in 2006 to Mrs. Obama — as well as 7,500 TreeHouse stock options worth more than $72,000 for each year.

TreeHouse foods makes stuff like “cheese sauces, non-dairy creamer, instant soup, puddings and powdered soft drink mixes.” They also supply food to McDonald’s. And you know how much she hates those golden arches.

Funny how all that bad-for-you food isn’t so bad when it causes money to just fall on your lap.

Big fat fail, FLOTUS. And to think – this time it wasn’t one of your bondage belts. Go figure.

Obama – The Movie

I can’t believe I missed this story for the past month. Apparently, HBO is producing a miniseries based on Obama and the 2008 Presidential campaign. It will be called “Game Change,” and it’ll feature the main cast of characters, including Obama, Michelle, Hillary, and of course, Sarah Palin. Because they have to have a villain, of course.

And, according to the article, liberal will equal good, and conservative will equal bad. Because OF COURSE IT WILL.

HBO’s previous foray into political drama, Recount, about the mess that followed the 2000 election certainly interpreted history in a certain way. The Democratic operatives who were fighting the post election recount battle were depicted as well meaning, if a bit naïve, and seriously unprepared for the bare knuckles fight that the Republican operatives gave them. The Republicans, for the most part, were vicious, win-at-all costs villains who didn’t care about democracy or fairness.

Did you guys catch that? Republicans don’t care about DEMOCRACY or FAIRNESS. Um, OK.

Casting for this miniseries is still in the air, and IHateTheMedia.com had a take on who they believe should play certain characters in the drama. For example, they thought that Will Smith should play Obama, while Patrick Ewing should play Michelle. And Beavis (from Beavis and Butthead) should obviously play Geithner. Brilliant.

Either way, I may have HBO shut off in my house when this piece of crap airs. Because last time I checked, I still lived in a non-socialist democracy. Well, for now, anyway.

Way to funnel the Kool-Aid, HBO. Nice work.

In Today’s Nanny State News…

…we have a Texas school, which, in its effort to comply with state law and continue to receive federal funding, has placed a 3rd grader in detention for a full week. Her crime? Possession.

Yup – this lovely, well-behaved third grader was punished for having a jolly rancher at lunch. And lest you think that “jolly rancher” is a new code word for either an illegal drug or a weapon of some sort, let me assure you – it was an Actual Jolly Rancher. This kid got a week’s detention for having piece of candy at lunch.

Meme Roth and Michelle Obama should be proud.

You know, I live in an area of the state which is known for the quality of its public schools. They are well-regarded, and have a great reputation. But if this isn’t a prime example of a reason to send your kids to private school, I don’t know what is. If I want Mini-Mock to have a piece of candy in his lunch, then he’ll freaking have a piece of candy in his lunch.

Ridiculous.

Question.

I’m not trying to be all birther-iffic on you, but I don’t understand this pesky habit Michelle Obama seems to have of referring to her husband as a Kenyan. I mean, first there was this, when she claimed Kenya was Barack’s “home country” and now this video from 2007 is uncovered, in which she flat out calls him a “Kenyan.”

Can someone please help me understand why she refers to him in this way?

Ooo – Michelle Is Not Going To Like This

According to the National Enquirer, Barack Obama “has been caught in a shocking cheating scandal with a former campaign aide.”

Normally, I’d just roll my eyes at this because no matter how much I can’t stand the guy’s policies, he’s always seemed like a genuinely good husband-type.  But this is the same National Enquirer who broke the affair of John Edwards, back when everyone was like “The National Enquirer has no credibility whatsoever”  so I suppose it’s not out of the realm of possibility.

And besides, it gave me a reason to post that picture of Michelle, which has always been a favorite.

This Was An Actual Indy Star Headline

In yesterday’s paper, in the metro section, a headline read as follows:

“Feet can be used to get to school”

Wow.  Gripping.

The article was all about a local school’s efforts to encourage kids to walk or bike to school.  You know, like they did in the olden days.  The days of yore, if you will.

I mean, it’s nice, right?  It’s nice for parents to encourage kids to get some exercise.

But here’s what’s ridiculous.  Apparently, parents couldn’t manage to encourage this without a GRANT.  The grant was given to the Department of Transportation, and from what I can gather from the article, the grant was then used to “organize a brigade of parents who will walk a large group of students to school.”

Wait.  Does this mean that parents are being paid for this?  Because I can’t figure out what sort of costs would be associated with “organizing parents” to walk their kids to school.  I mean, if a parent wants their kid to walk to school, they just say, “Hey kid – you’re walking to school.”  Or, at most, if they want to have a group of kids walk together, it’s MAYBE a phone call or two, right?

One happy parent, who sends her kids out the door each day to walk to school, accompanied by her husband, said, about the program, “We love it.  It’s been wonderful for the family, for the community.”

Say whaa?  Why did it take any amount of community organizing to freaking have your kids walk to school? I wasn’t aware that there was a huge societal problem of parents agonizing in their kitchens each day about how in the world they would ever manage to have their kids walk to school without grant money and organization.

But this all ties in very nicely to Michelle Obama’s “Let’s Move” initiative, which the article makes mention of.

It’s community organizing, you guys.  The Obamas are famous for that.

Is anyone else reminiscing about walking-to-school-both-ways-in-the-freezing-cold stories that you heard from your parents/grandparents?  I wonder how in the world they were able to coordinate their walking-to-school efforts without Michelle’s Let’s Move program.

Curious.

Not to be all conspiracy theory-ish, but I’m curious – how do YOU define “home country?”

Here’s wikipedia’s definition.

Wonder what Michelle’s definition is?

Michelle Obama Wants You To Sacrifice

You know what Michelle clearly hasn’t read? Atlas Shrugged.

She seems to have a really good grasp of Marx though.

Screw That Groundhog Dude. It Must Be Spring, Because FLOTUS Is Going Sleeveless Again.

Yes, this is a petty post. So, if you want something less petty, you may want to just skip over it altogether. You’ve been warned. And, frankly, I’m in healthcare monstrosity denial tonight, so sue me. The line formed a year ago, so feel free to jump right in.

According to Michelle Obama’s Mirror’s Blog, her arms have been exposed once again, which obviously means that bikini season is on the horizon.

Behold:

Looking like a candy striper that is paying obvious homage to Bo’s healthcare nightmare, she is sans her usual bondage belt. I repeat – SANS bondage belt, you guys. Upon first glance, I was downright hopeful, to say the least. And in this particular picture, I’ll even go as far as to say that she looks kinda cute and the outfit may even look like something I would wear. Then, I looked further and noticed that the skirt’s waist is not really at her waist, but right below her breastular area, taking the place of her usual bondage belt:

I was actually hurt by the sheer deceitfulness of this bondage belt that is merely pretending to be a skirt.

And then she totally lost me:

Perhaps a much-needed stylist would’ve prompted her to go up a size. But that’s neither here nor there. The important thing is that FLOTUS has spoken. Spring has sprung. Bring on the flip-flops.

Related Posts with Thumbnails