Advertisement

Tag Archive for 'liberal'

You Know You Suck When You’re Sending Chachi Death Threats…

Published by Daisy on January 22, 2010 in General Political Mockery. 15 Comments Tags: , , , , , , , .

Scott Baio is getting death threats for posting an “unflattering picture” of Michelle Obama on his Twitter page.

Here’s the “unflattering picture:”

(All death threats to me should be sent directly to the Daisy email on the right pane. Please refrain from sending death threats to Mock. Thank you.)

From Gateway Pundit yesterday morning:

Former “Happy Days” star Scott Baio claims he has been barraged with death threats and accused of being a racist after posting an unflattering photo of Michelle Obama on Twitter along with the caption “WOW He wakes up to this every morning.”

Outraged users reportedly responded with angry Tweets such as “Scott Baio should be PUT DOWN and someone will PUT YOU DOWN.YOU; your WIFE and KID.” Another Tweeter even went as far as to alter an image of Baio’s young child with the caption “this is what Scott Baio wakes up [to].” That photo has since been removed.

Nice, huh?

And it’s all because he supported Scott Brown openly. Because, let’s face it, if you live in Hollyweird, you’re not supposed to BE conservative.

The actor was also quick to defend himself from accusations that he was racist.

“I’m NOT racist for posting a pic of M.O. My WIFE’S BEST FRD IS BLACK, HELLO,” he Tweeted. “If YOU are born in AMERICA, U ARE AN AMERICAN. I don’t insist on being called Italian-American. Therefore Black Amer are not Afr-Amer. Or that would mean people (white or black) born in Africa would be called African-Africans … Just a thought to think about… If I’m racist, don’t think I would have Directed shows like The Parkers & The Wayans Bros. or worked 41 eps w/ Victoria Rowell on D.Murder.”

The compassionate and tolerant and open-minded, progressive left in action, folks. But just so we’re all clear on what’s acceptable and what’s not these days, as Chachi so nicely pointed out, it’s perfectly acceptable for Jennifer Lopez to call Sarah Palin a bitch.

(“La cabrona,” for all you non-Spanish-speakers, means “bitch.”)

Double standards are awesome, aren’t they?

Guess There Are A Lot More Of Us Stockholm-Syndromed Freak Wackjobs Out There Than Anyone Realized. Go Figure.

Published by Daisy on January 17, 2010 in General Political Mockery. 11 Comments Tags: , , , , , , .

Conservatives outnumber liberals now. And, I’m not getting this from Rasmussen, all of you out there that’ll tell me THOSE are skewed (because they aren’t in your favor). I’m getting it from Gallup. I believe liberals like Gallup. Or they did, anyway. Regardless, there’s a 1% margin of error.

More specifically from a poll last week, “the final year-end political ideology figures confirm Gallup’s initial reporting: conservatives (40%) outnumbered both moderates (36%) and liberals (21%) across the nation in 2009. More broadly, the percentage of Americans calling themselves either conservative or liberal has increased over the last decade, while the percentage of moderates has declined.”

The poll looks at the past decade, and it shows that less people are identifying themselves as “moderate,” and they’re going for either conservative or liberal these days. I myself was a moderate for many, many years, so I can relate. Basically, more and more people are identifying themselves as conservative, whereas the liberal front is losing some momentum. The main point? Political independents showed increased attachment to the “conservative” label in 2009, boosting the overall ranks of that group so that it now clearly outnumbers moderates in Gallup’s annual averages for the first time since 2004.

Huh. I wonder if it has anything to do with the fact that Americans, deep down, believe that socialism sucks. And that the government officials in the seats right now – especially the majority – could be easily replaced with poo-flinging chimpanzees. In fact, I’d venture to say that the poo-flinging chimps could probably make better decisions for this country. But, I’m one of those wackjobs in the right-wing-extremist minority majority, so what do I know….

You may want to pay attention to stuff like this, Dems.  The elections are getting closer. :-)

As If Anyone Expected Otherwise, Ed…

Published by Mockarena on January 16, 2010 in Really?. 19 Comments Tags: , .

Ed Schultz, admired by liberals everywhere, explains how he would go about making sure Martha Coakley wins on Tuesday.

I’m not surprised by the admission – I’m just surprised he’s being so vocal about it.

Liberals are funny. :)

And This Is When They All Start Turning On Each Other…

Published by Daisy on January 11, 2010 in General Political Mockery. 1 Comment Tags: , , , , , , .

I came across this little tidbit today and thought it was interesting. It’s actually not a tidbit, as much as it is a slam from Hillary Clinton against Obama. There’s this new book out – The Race of a Lifetime - and in it, Hillary is accusing Obamamessiah of cheating during the ‘08 campaign.

Oh the shock, dismay, and horror!

Hats off to Gateway Pundit for this quick glimpse into liberals turning on each other like rabid, frothing-at-the-mouth coyotes:

Hillary Clinton is depicted — and quoted — as foul-mouthed and consumed with anger over what she saw as the media’s kid-gloved treatment of Mr Obama. She was convinced that he had cheated at the start of their marathon primary contest by bringing in outsiders to vote in the Iowa caucuses, and when it was over she was supremely reluctant to work for him, the authors claim.

Just so we’re all clear on what’s offensive and what’s not to liberals, I’ve now learned this week that if you indeed ARE a liberal/Democrat, you’re allowed to call our fearless leader a cheater AND a light-skinned Negro.

If you’re a Republican/conservative, however, you are not allowed to do any of these such things. Or disagree with his policies. Or think he’s completely unqualified to run a company, let alone a country. Or call him a liar. I mean, just ask Joe Wilson, for crying out loud.

Glad I could get that cleared up. They should really come out with a rule book for this stuff, as I’m starting to get a bit confused. My tiny little Stockholm-Syndromed brain is starting to hurt from all the double standards…

Another Shining Example Of That Compassionate Liberal Thing…

Published by Daisy on January 8, 2010 in General Political Mockery. 3 Comments Tags: , , , , , .

Here are three liberal radio personalities – one that I’ve never even heard of, to be honest – basically spewing stuff out of their pieholes because they’re obviously mad that Rush Limbaugh got attention last week for being sick and all. You know, just to perpetuate that whole belief that liberals are uber-compassionate and loving and they’re the REAL humanitarians of the world. You know….a lot like these other compassionate and loving liberals.

I especially enjoyed when the guy I’ve never heard of talked about how there are so many “right-wing crazy bastards” out there….we’re like “fleas.” Fleas, you guys.

That is some PRIZE-winning entertainment right there, folks. No wonder their ratings are just ridiculously through the roof! (not)

Oh, and Ron? Your Dad must be rolling over in his grave. What a joke.

Obamamessiah’s Doing Badly In The Polls? Must Be Those Stupid Polls…

Published by Daisy on January 3, 2010 in General Political Mockery. 3 Comments Tags: , , , , , , , , .

You know those Rasmussen polls that we reference here a lot? You know, the ones that are unbiased, data-driven polls showing how someone like The President of the United States is doing in the eyes of the American people?

Yeah, well, the Democrats have now taken their “compassionate” anger and directed it toward Mr. Rasmussen himself. You see, they don’t like Rasmussen because the numbers aren’t in their favor. It’s as simple as that, but they’re dancing around that simplicity to attempt to paint the polls as somehow flawed.

They don’t like the data, for one, but they also don’t like the way “the firm frames questions in its automated polls, which are the staple of its work.” It’s kind of like that Birkenstock-wearing, no-armpit-shaving, man-hating liberal professor at my southern undergraduate university that used to tell me that SATs were biased toward white males. You know, based on those English questions and math problems. Enlightening.

Rasmussen is defending himself by saying that “his numbers are trending Republican simply because he is screening for only those voters most likely to head to the polls — a pool of respondents, he argues, that just so happens to bend more conservative this election cycle.” Polling all adults — a method used by Gallup, another polling firm that conducts a daily tracking poll of Obama — Rasmussen acknowledged, is “always going to yield a better result for Democrats.”

Rasmussen is quick to point out the accuracy of his surveys — noting how close his firm was to predicting the final outcome in this fall’s New Jersey governor’s race. (Rasmussen’s final survey in the race showed Republican Chris Christie edging out Gov. Jon Corzine 46 percent to 43 percent. Christie beat Corzine 48 percent to 45 percent on Election Day.) And he argues that he was among the first pollsters to show Obama narrowing the gap with Hillary Clinton in the 2008 Democratic presidential primary.

But if you don’t like the message, well, you know the old saying…

I suppose 2010 and 2012 will show the reality. When a nice chunk of these Democrats who have IGNORED their constituents are booted out of office, I wonder who they’ll blame then?

Oh that’s right! I forgot for a second. They’ll blame BUSH, of course…

Rush Limbaugh Is Hospitalized, And The (Violently) Compassionate Left Wants Him To Die. With Expletives.

Published by Daisy on January 1, 2010 in General Political Mockery. 8 Comments Tags: , , , , .

I was reading I Hate the Media this morning in between contemplating life and resolutions and cleaning out my closets and organizing the nursery on this first day of 2010, and I came across this entry that has a bunch of liberal tweets regarding Rush Limbaugh’s hospitalization.

I’ll be the first to admit that I want to punch Pelosi in the face a lot of days, but I don’t go around saying that I want her to f*cking die. And, I surely wouldn’t write that – perhaps I have dabbled too much into Buddhism to know that karma’s a real bitch, for one, and two – last time I checked, we’re still a civilized society.

The tweets seen in this article made me reflect on the year past and the inception of our humble little site. We’ve had a lot of liberals scream at us, telling us that we’re being “mean” and “spreading hatred” by the entries we post. But when it all comes down to it, the source site said it best – Conservatives hate policies. Liberals hate people.

And, I couldn’t agree more.

I personally have seen more hate directed at me this year BECAUSE I’ve chosen to state my opinions about bogus policies on this blog. I’ve always felt the way I feel about such policies – I’m just putting it out there now. And, the backlash has been directed at us personally, rather than the policies in question. It’s a strange phenomenon to me. Mock and I have had to ban two people specifically from the site this year, and one of them happened to be a personal family member of mine. I’ve lost a few liberal friends who just can’t stand what I have to say. Funny thing is – I always knew their liberal stances, they’ve always been more outspoken about them than I have. I just figured it was one of those “agree to disagree, love them regardless” type things. Weirdly enough, though, it hasn’t worked that way as much from a reciprocal point of view.

It’s been a year of eye-opening realizations, to say the least.

The purpose of me writing this entry today is to put forth the notion that when someone deems themself as compassionate, tolerant, loving, and “progressive,” I’ve learned to take that at face value and really wait to see for myself. Because, there’s one thing that this administration has taught me more than any other – words are words. Semantics are just semantics. And your actions speak so loudly, I cannot hear what you say…

Here are some of the tweets in response to Rush Limbaugh’s hospitalization. They’re words, sure, but holy crap, they’re just a wee bit bothersome – even to a conservative nutjob like me.

READ AT YOUR OWN RISK: Some vile language and a lot of vile thoughts are included.

@kenneth212 Rush Limbaugh was rushed to the hospital in Honolulu. Maybe Santa did get my letter.
@tontocorazon RT @Pumpy_Beanis DIE RUSH LIMBAUGH YOU F***ING PIG MAN JUST F***ING DIE
@phontigallo: I was scared of another death this year til I heard Rush Limbaugh was in the hospital. Come on 2009; don’t fail me now
@amazingatheist: Ruch Limbaugh hospitalized with chest pains. Let’s all hope he dies.
@heartfeltrobot YES VIRGINIA, THERE IS A SANTA CLAUS! RT @cnnbrk Radio host Rush Limbaugh was rushed to a Honolulu hospital with chest pains.
@Teevho Rush Limbaugh in serious condition in the hospital? Oh happy day! Are they sure he didn’t just ingest too much hillbilly heroin?
@bbb1962 RT @MelechT: Rush Limbaugh was rushed to the Hospital. Just when I thought Christmas was over… #divinejustice #kanyeshrug *Lmfao!*
@Yves_V So Rush Limbaugh in the hospital? If he dies, 2009 won’t be so bad after all #JustSayin
@twofacedmonster So sad…cough. RT @cnnbrk: Radio host Rush Limbaugh was rushed to a Honolulu hospital with chest pains
@OTOOLEFAN: Rush Limbaugh rushed to the hospital? Are the Death Panels in place yet?
@riegelracing Rush Limbaugh had a heart attack?!?! Its a late birthday present!!!!!!
@stratogato Rush Limbaugh, say hello to LUCIFER when you get there my friend
@margery Is Rush Limbaugh terminally sick? Yippee
@ocicat_bengals Smite Rush Limbaugh in 2009!
@ZSS This just in, Rush Limbaugh hospitalized. How much you want to bet the words “hookers” and “blow” aren’t too far behind?
@RJ_Acosta i now heard this rush guy is an asshole,Rush Limbaugh,i hope you die in hell mother fucker!
@dingane1: if rush Limbaugh dies ill let 09 slide on taking MJ
@the_condor RUSH LIMBAUGH SHOULD BE IN PRISON FOR HATE CRIMES. LET HIM DIE.
@dreamhampton Rush Limbaugh doesnt deserve to die the same year as MJ. Keep breathin u fat f**k
#JerseyHardcore9 Btw f**k rush limbaugh hope he had a coronary and finally bit it
@Mysterious_Andy In case that last tweet was unclear: I hope that hate-mongering f**k, Rush Limbaugh, dies. The world would be a better place without him.
@9thwardBee Rush Limbaugh can choke on a fat dick F**k Him!
@KushME Rush Limbaugh n tha hospital… Shit that fool gets no sympathy from me… he doesn’t like my kind! So f**k em!
@BEZZLE “MAN FUCK Rush Limbaugh TELL EM I SAID IT!” TELL HIM I CO-SIGNED THE F**K ALSO WITH A SWINE FLU INDUCED BABY LEG IN HIS ASS
@iHateJeffBaker Rush Limbaugh Hospitalized in Hawaii. Guess what? Who gives a f**k? Not I.
eapsta: F**k I hope rush limbaugh is really dead
@SaidInTexas “All I want to hear is that Rush Limbaugh is dead! I got up early. I’ve watched all day. Just DIE already.” woman on phone in Odessa sbux
@beauessai You know, I think I could have forgiven this decade for all its bullshit if it had ended with a dead Limbaugh.

Soak it in, everyone. Compassion at its finest. The “caring and loving and humane” left. Unlike those pro-Constitution, pro-individual responsibility right-wing freaks.

And as Forrest Gump said, “that’s all I got to say about that.”

Happy New Year, everyone.

Dissection Of An Obviously Race-Driven Conservative Ad – Really?

Published by Daisy on December 16, 2009 in General Political Mockery. 6 Comments Tags: , , , , , , .

Shame on those race-card-playing conservative wackjobs. I mean, they’re causing confusion among the liberal elite. In the clip below, Rachel Maddow and her lemming du jour need help in understanding an ad put forth by conservatives to mock the fact that if they disagree with Obamacare, they’re all labeled as silly racists. I think it’s pretty self-explanatory – and it honestly doesn’t take an entire 8-minute segment to dissect, but I’m also not of the same intellectual capacity as someone like Maddow and friend, obviously. I mean, the last time I checked, they all thought I was suffering from Stockholm Syndrome, so take this entry for what it’s worth, people.

For all you simpletons like me out there, I’ll break it down in Readers Digest for Dummies format –

Liberals are allowed to play the race card. Liberals are allowed to scream “racist!” at conservatives who are opposed to the healthcare bill, mainly because if we don’t agree with Obama on ANY issue, we are obviously racist. And, of course, liberals are the only ones who can determine what is offensive, as they’re the only ones who are allowed to get offended. If a conservative is offended, on the other hand, well, um, HUH? WHAAAA? Conservatives can’t be offended, silly! I mean, we’re all just a bunch of walking white stereotypes void of feelings and emotion and compassion. This is common knowledge in today’s MSM, right?

If one can’t understand the blatant mocking of the fact that race is even an issue at ALL in this monstrosity of a health bill, then one may need to take the giant “I’m a victim” plug out of one’s assular cavity. Especially if you’re spending a whole segment on your show dissecting it. I’m just sayin.

Here’s a newsflash to the ones offended by this ad. The bill sucks monkey poo. And, out of the 61% of people who oppose it, I would venture to say that not all 61% of them are racist a$$holes. They maaaaay just think it’s a fiscally irresponsible piece of crap. They may believe that it’s going to cost way more than what the Messiah has promised (because, let’s face it, the dude has broken just a wee bit of his campaign promises already in one short year). They may believe that their freedom is being stripped away, and this is a huge part of the beginning of that stripping process. They may just have an issue with government attempting to have more control over our health, our families’ health, and the ramifications that are consequential from such governmental control. They may believe in personal responsibility. In a free market. In LESS government. Hell, they MAY be actually satisfied with their current healthcare. You know – the one they work hard for to provide to their family, because they don’t see it as a right, but rather a privilege.

And all of this maaay just be what this ad is trying to point out. By being snarky. Hello.

According to Maddow and company, it’s pathetic that conservatives would use race in this way. It’s OBSCENE, I think was the exact word used in the dissection. Because, you know, Democrats NEVER pull the race card for their own gain. Ever.

Wow.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Because, You Know, When I Want To Get Informed, I Watch Law And Order…

Published by Daisy on December 13, 2009 in General Political Mockery. 13 Comments Tags: , , , , .

Actually, I’ve never watched the show. Sorry to disappoint.

But I have heard the hoopla surrounding the creator’s nice little liberal agenda that he so gracefully spews through thespians like Ice T and that dude that used to be on Night Court.

Isn’t it lovely that you can’t even watch a freakin’ TV show without blatant liberal indoctrination being thrown in?

I think O’Reilly does a nice job defending himself here. You know, with data and examples and rational thought. Unlike the fairy-tale crap that we get shoved down our throats daily from Hollyweird.

GAWD.

Because You Can’t Dispute Real Data…

Published by Daisy on November 18, 2009 in General Political Mockery. 2 Comments Tags: , , , , , , , .

…and that whole buyer’s remorse thing is a real bitch.

obama_approval_index_november_18_2009

Mr. Holocaust Slinger At It Again

Published by Daisy on November 5, 2009 in General Political Mockery. 5 Comments Tags: , , , , , , , .

Here’s Alan Grayson, reading off a list of names HE claims will die because of no health insurance.

This is HIS calculation of who “will die as a result of lacking health insurance — in each district represented by a GOP member of Congress who opposes health care reform. His approach: Name the district, then name of the Republican, then enumerate the number of people who will die without health insurance based on a Harvard analysis — suggesting that the members were responsible for the body count.”

Fuzzy math is awesome. So is pointing a finger at Republicans and blaming them for the death of countless people that you have pulled directly out of your assular area. Stellar. Really.

I saw some comments about this video which were kind of, well, amusing. One in particular said something about how he should read off the number of abortions that took place in Democrat districts. He’d be standing there a hell of a lot longer than an hour, for sure. And, in McBotox’s health bill, we all get to pay for those. Yay!

Hey Florida – I hope you’re proud of this complete and total wackjob of an embarrassment.

Data Showing That Conservatives Know More About Politics Than Their Liberal Counterparts

Published by Daisy on October 30, 2009 in General Political Mockery. 2 Comments Tags: , , , , , , .

Did I mention the word data? Why yes, I did. You see, that kooky thing called ‘data’ is something that conservatives happen to love. So as a conservative chick myself, you can only imagine my delight when I saw some actual numbers that coincide with what we’ve been talking about here on COTR over the last day and a half. That whole liberal vs. conservative argument thing.

In a recent poll taken by the Pew Research Center, they took “a Pew Political IQ test conducted over the phone with 1,002 adults from Oct. 1-4. They were asked 12 questions, and answered an average of 5.3 questions correctly.”

What interested me the most about this poll is the section titled “Partisan Knowledge Gap.” Often portrayed as toothless, redneck, racist, slackjawed, homophobe, nutjob, crazy, whitebread, right-wing extremists with no brains in their heads, but really, really big gun racks in their big ol’ rusted-out pickup trucks, it was interesting to see that Republicans actually know more about politics than Democrats.

Huh. Who would’ve thunk it? Our tiny little acorn-sized brains may have gotten lucky here, but the numbers are interesting, nonetheless, so here they are for sh*ts and giggles:

dems versus reps

Summed up nicely by The Weekly Standard:

Under a section called “Partisan Knowledge Gap,” we find Republicans were more knowledgeable by a double-digit factor on four issues. Although the Glenn Beck question is naturally easier for Republicans, the other three issues are basic political knowledge— what “cap-and-trade” means, who’s in control of the House, and who the new Supreme Court Justice is (a question that should perhaps be easier for Democrats). Republicans also led Democrats on identifying the unemployment rate, Fed chairman, Dow level, Max Baucus’ position. Republicans correctly answered an Iran/Israel question and an Afghanistan question more often than Dems. Republicans and Democrats were even on identifying the “public option” as a health-care plan.

But all you Janeane Garofalos out there – take heart. You led the poll on one question, I think, and because I know you will, regardless, you can just keep on pretending that conservatives are just as dumb as a box of rocks. Subsequently, we’ll pass on the emotional arguments that have little to nothing to back it up and keep digging for the real data that actually matters when all is said and done.

Camille’s Take On Liberalism

Published by Daisy on October 25, 2009 in General Political Mockery. 5 Comments Tags: , , , , , , , .

paglia

Camille Paglia rocks. In fact, Camille was on the possible name list for my unborn daughter – because of Camille Paglia. My husband didn’t particularly like the name compared to some others, so it has since been knocked off the list. However, I still giggle a bit to think that I – a female conservative blogger – would’ve named my daughter after a female liberal feminist Democrat. And been proud to do so, no less.

Paglia is insanely brilliant and tells it like it is – and this has always warranted my respect, regardless of her political affiliation. American Thinker did a recent piece on her, highlighting her growing buyer’s remorse for the Obama administration (also highlighting her disdain for Clinton and that “yuppie George Stephanopoulos”). There was one passage in particular (from her September 9th column in Salon.com) that I felt compelled to share, as it really hit home…

Why did it take so long for Democrats to realize that this year’s tea party and town hall uprisings were a genuine barometer of widespread public discontent and not simply a staged scenario by kooks and conspirators? [...] It was on talk radio, which I have resumed monitoring around the clock because of the healthcare fiasco, that I heard the passionate voices of callers coming directly from the town hall meetings.

Why has the Democratic Party become so arrogantly detached from ordinary Americans? Though they claim to speak for the poor and dispossessed, Democrats have increasingly become the party of an upper-middle-class professional elite, top-heavy with journalists, academics and lawyers (one reason for the hypocritical absence of tort reform in the healthcare bills). Weirdly, given their worship of highly individualistic, secularized self-actualization, such professionals are as a whole amazingly credulous these days about big-government solutions to every social problem. They see no danger in expanding government authority and intrusive, wasteful bureaucracy. This is, I submit, a stunning turn away from the anti-authority and anti-establishment principles of authentic 1960s leftism.

How has “liberty” become the inspirational code word of conservatives rather than liberals? [...] I always thought that the Democratic Party is the freedom party — but I must be living in the nostalgic past. [...]

[A]ffluent middle-class Democrats now seem to be complacently servile toward authority and automatically believe everything party leaders tell them. Why? Is it because the new professional class is a glossy product of generically institutionalized learning? Independent thought and logical analysis of argument are no longer taught. Elite education in the U.S. has become a frenetic assembly line of competitive college application to schools where ideological brainwashing is so pandemic that it’s invisible.

That passage alone speaks volumes for itself. It’s what we tend to point out on a regular basis here at COTR (just maybe not so eloquently). It’s interesting how a party who says they’re for the “little guy” really doesn’t give two craps about that little guy at all. There’s a big disconnect these days between the two kinds of liberals left in this country – the “far left ideologues who believe that government is the answer to all our problems” and the “smaller and shrinking group is made up of open minded liberals who are not afraid to speak out when they see corruption and incompetence in today’s leaders.”

The latter is dying out quickly, it seems.

They say that Paglia is in a small handful of the last remaining “open-minded liberals” and that she’s been outnumbered by the radicals who think that the government knows all. I mean, let’s face it, folks – liberalism no longer stands for liberty. Quite the opposite, really. It’s the conservatives who think that government should get the hell out of the way and let people actually RETAIN their liberties and freedoms. We don’t want government in our healthcare. We don’t want them making our financial decisions for us. We don’t want them telling us when to turn our lights off and what color to paint our rooftops. We are smarter than the federal government. Period. And when they claim to be smarter than us, we find it downright hysterically laughable.

We are the rebellious ones now. The “extremists.” The dissenters. Go figure.

So, Camille – here’s to the endangered species of the “open-minded” liberal. I have to say, though…at the rate things are going in this country – with this administration in office – I see extinction drawing nearer and nearer. And when that day comes, maybe Ms. Paglia will take a leap to our side of the fence.

Stranger things have happened, you know.

Um, Yeah…About Conservatism Being Dead….

Published by Daisy on October 20, 2009 in General Political Mockery. 1 Comment Tags: , , , , , , , , .

lens2054263_1229291097democrat-vs-republican

Remember when Obama was elected almost a year ago, and Democrats would scream, “Oh, the conservative party is dead!”

Insert donkey foot in mouth.

Right now in Virginia, “Democrats are desperately trying to hang onto the governorship.”

The political climate is quoted as being this: Loyal Democrats are more subdued than last fall. Republicans are energized. Independents are proving to be … independent. Voters of all kinds seem disenchanted.

You read that? Republicans are energized. You think? Cue the tea parties and the blogs popping up all over the place and the absolute outrage in the empty rhetoric and lies. The sleeping giant has awakened to find that things are all sorts of FUBAR, and conservatives are starting to pay attention more, talk more, and act more. And, in light of Obama and his cronies trying to squelch the news media (FOX), it’s obvious that Dems aren’t too happy with this turn of events. But this phenomenon goes beyond Virginia, folks. Apparently, it’s indicative of the national political climate.

Republicans are far more fired up than Democrats, and independents who leaned left just a year ago are tilting away. Frustration over the status quo, fear of the country’s direction, and disillusionment about political leaders span the ideological spectrum.

Of course, in true Republican/Democrat fashion, the Virginia gubernatorial ticket includes a Republican (McDonnell) who is having to defend his stance on social issues (based on some graduate thesis he wrote 20 years ago), and the Democrat (Deeds) is being called out on his promise to raise $1 billion a year needed to revive critical transportation projects. People are asking how, and of course, in true Democrat fashion, the dude can’t answer how. Because IT CAN”T FRIGGIN BE DONE. But, like most empty Democrat promises, it’s just easier to not answer questions and keep dishing out flowery words to people instead (sound familiar, President Obama?).

It’s going to be an interesting race – mainly because of its parallel to the national political scene and upcoming trends being seen in voters across the country. People are sick of being lied to. And while the Obamabots are still happy and feeling the buzz of last year’s election, independents are starting to scratch their heads and figure out that hope and change is just that – words.

But, go on ahead, all you liberals out there….just go on drinking that Kool-Aid and thinking that we’re all dead and gone…

See ya in 2010.

I Just Vomited A Little In My Mouth…

Published by Daisy on October 7, 2009 in General Political Mockery and Really?. 4 Comments Tags: , , , , , , .

And it’s not a pregnancy symptom, for once. It’s due to a complete overflow of liberal hypocrisy seen in this video. Olbermann and Huffington are praising Congressman Grayson for “speaking the truth” and being such a pillar of politics. To describe it briefly in one sentence: Liberal lips planted firmly on Grayson’s holocaust-spewing, “Republicans want you to to die and have no plan,” boldfaced-lying assular area.

But yeah, Dems. Joe Wilson should be strung up and executed for calling Obama a liar (when, in fact, he was actually lying).

The score? Liberal hypocrisy – 1. The real truth? 0.

Aaaand, here comes my breakfast. Again.

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

This Just In: Janeane Garofalo Still Thinks We’re All Racists

Published by Daisy on October 3, 2009 in General Political Mockery. 11 Comments Tags: , , , .

She delivered this whopper of a statement on Bill Maher. Because it’s not tired and unfounded and completely blanket stereotyping (not to mention racist on HER part). In the past few days, she’s been on Maher’s show, as well as Joy Behar’s, to spew her nonsense. Two pillars of objective journalism, of course.

In the following video, you’ll hear her same old delusional statements such as “…it’s obvious to anybody who has eyes in this country that tea-baggers, the 9-12ers are clearly white power movements led by the Glenn Becks, the Michelle Bachmans, the Rush Limbaughs.”

And then you hear applause from the Maher sheep that are obviously too weak to think for themselves.

You know what struck me most about hearing her rant this morning? It was a timely little addendum to a documentary I watched last night called “Indoctrinate U,” where a conservative kid (raised by REAL liberal parents who taught him to THINK FOR HIMSELF) went to universities all over the country and exposed blatant, raging liberal bias. Something along the lines of 80% of university professors are liberal. And the movement toward silencing ANYTHING conservative is becoming rampant – frighteningly so – in our universities. If you haven’t seen the documentary, I highly suggest you check it out. The stories of conservative-minded students having to “play along” with liberal professors to ensure good grades is absolutely mind-boggling to me. The idea that a Republican professor at UC Berkeley would basically be run off campus blows my mind. The notion of liberal professors DENYING any sort of alternative (conservative) discourse makes me know that our schools don’t want education. They want indoctrination. Period.

And Janeane Garofalo? The screams of “racist” are an obvious jerk-defense from an inner fear of that scaaaary opposing viewpoint. Liberals these days don’t want discussion or dialogue or bipartisanship or a real, honest debate containing facts and real data. They want anyone who speaks out against the government to shut up already. This is obvious in our society and schools, and it irks the crap out of me.

This is not freedom, you guys. This is not American.

Pawlenty Preps For Presidential Position…

Published by Daisy on October 2, 2009 in General Political Mockery. 14 Comments Tags: , , , , , , , , , .

TimPawlenty

Tim Pawlenty, the Governor of Minnesota, has “been quietly assembling the blueprint of a presidential campaign even as he has stayed under the radar of D.C.’s political community.”

As we all bask in the failure of the current administration, conservatives are asking the question, “who will run in 2012?” Mock and I have our favorite – that would be Mitch Daniels (Governor of our great state of Indiana), but I’m not convinced that he’ll be persuaded to run. Daniels, after all, is an anomaly in politics – he’s so incredibly REAL and normal. He uses that neat cornerstone of conservatism called common sense. But so far, Mitch has been elusive on the presidential thing. Even though he’d be perfect for the job.

We’re not giving up on our man Mitch just yet, FYI…

In the meantime, there are others cropping up. This week – it’s Pawlenty, who’s drawing attention for his newly-drawn blueprint for a campaign. I don’t know much about Pawlenty. I’ve seen him in a few segments on T.V. and in the news every once in a while, but as for pros and cons, I’ll have to do more research.

That’s why I loved this article this morning that spells out some of the weaknesses and strengths for a Pawlenty bid in the White House.

I’ll let you read the article in its entirety for the weaknesses, but here are some of his strengths:

“He’s right on the “conservative” issues that do matter to people outside the base – especially in a season where independents are getting serious buyer’s remorse over the neosocialist baggage that came with all the Hope and Change (TM).”

“Pawlenty is, in theory, the kind of “conservative” who should be able to reach out successfully to independents. For all the Minnesota left’s incessant whining, he’s not a dogmatic conservative. He’s focused less on conservative dogma, and more on results in his six years.”

“Pawlenty has formidable stage presence. He’s much more polished onstage than Sarah Palin – but can fairly be said to match her folksy bonhomie; he plays the “Son of a meat-packer” card with consistency but grace. As important, he exudes the same sense of gravitas and competency that Romney does – he has paid his dues with interest – without sounding like a CEO in the process.”

And those are just a few…

So, a Pawlenty ticket? From what I’m seeing so far, I could get on board – more so if he chose Mitch as his V.P. :-)

Someone Tell Me What Obama Has DONE So Far…

Published by Daisy on September 25, 2009 in General Political Mockery. 27 Comments Tags: , , , , , , .

 blame bush

This has been the million-dollar question these days.

You see, Mock and I enjoy this neat little thing called irate liberal backlash – we get a handful of liberals that like to write in and tell us how awful it must be to be us. How exhausting it must be to be so disillusioned and critical of the current administration all the time. Our answer to that is simple – the administration makes it WAAAAY too easy to criticize them. There’s so much incompetence every day, you’d have to have your head dunked in the Kool-Aid not to notice.

The liberal answer to that incompetence? What about BUSHITY BUSH? And one of our favorites, YOU’RE A RACIST FOR NOT LIKING OBAMA! To which we shake our heads in disbelief that anyone with an Actual Brain would ever believe that statements like that could be logical arguments against the case of how badly this administration, well, has monkey poo thus far. 

In response to the lame, personal-attack arguments, I usually ask our dear liberal readers – tell me something GOOD, then. For the love of all that’s wonderful, tell me what OBAMA HAS DONE SO FAR that has redeeming qualities. Because, I really, REALLY want to know.  It’s never rhetorical.  I honestly want them to tell me what he’s done that’s so great.  But the answer I always get without fail?  What about Bush?  Therein lies the exhaustion…as opposed to the presumed hardship it is to be me.

So, you can only imagine my delight when I found this article that outlines exactly what the administration HAS done since Obama took office. It was as if someone had finally answered the million dollar question. And, of course, clever and competent readers, I knew I had to pass that information on to you.

What Obama has done so far:

  • Insulted England
    - giving DVDs that only play on American players to Gordon Brown
    - returned the Churchill bust
    - gave the Queen an iPod full of his own speeches
    - recently rebuffed Gordon Brown five times
  • Insulted Poland & Czechoslovakia
    - unilaterally broke a missile defense agreement with no warning, on the anniversary of the Russian invasion
  • Insulted and threatened Israel
    - “We are going to change the world. Please, don’t interfere.” The report said Netanyahu’s aides interpreted this as a “threat.”
    - delivered an anti-Israel speech at the UN
  • Aided in a coup against Honduras’ legitimate government after they legally ousted Zelaya
  • Failed to bring himself to even offer a kind word to Iran’s brave protesters – for how many days? – while they were being butchered in the streets by a government to which Obama can’t stop pandering
  • Embraced dictators and bowed to Saudi Arabia’s king
  • He’s broken so many campaign promises I can’t even keep count, especially ones related to lobbyists and transparency
  • Allowed his Attorney General to selectively prosecute racially charged cases
  • Announced decision to close GTMO in a year – though with no real plan of what to do with its inmates
  • Tripled the deficit and even has China worried about whether we are a good investment

And then you add in things such as the Special Olympics comment on Leno, his ridiculous (and failed) Czar appointments, his fumbling with healthcare and the back-and-forth public option (not to mention the condescending dismissal of any naysayers of said legislation), his obvious incompetence as Commander in Chief of the military, and his worldwide apology tour for how much America sucks (and those are just a few off the top of my head), and there you have it.  A tip of the iceberg of his accomplishments so far – but a definite start. 

Well, I feel much better now that it’s in list form.  And, when I ask the question next time, all of our loyal readers are welcome to use this as a cheat sheet for convenience.

Jimmy Carter Thinks I’m Racist, Perpetuating The Notion That Democrats Don’t Have A Freakin’ Leg To Stand On In Defending Their Policies

Published by Daisy on September 16, 2009 in General Political Mockery and Really?. 27 Comments Tags: , , , , , , .

Here’s Mr. Carter talking about how anyone who doesn’t support Obama’s policies is just flat-out racist.

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

Well, if Jimmy Carter calls anyone who opposes Obama a racist, then it MUST be true, right?

GAWD.

I should be shocked by this? At this point, the racist argument is becoming downright laughable to me. There is no shock value in it whatsoever. It’s been played by the Democratic party so much that it’s getting pathetic now. I mean, when a Liberal/Democrat has no argumentative ammunition – something POSITIVE to say about Obama, his administration, his policies, his accomplishments thus far, or those of the many criminals, wackjobs, corrupt organizations and hypocrites he associates with – it’s much easier to just throw the race card. Hell, I could be pink with purple polka dots, married to a black man, with a Chinese baby, and if I didn’t like Obama’s policies – I’d still be a southern redneck racist.

Well, thanks for enlightening me, oh Democrat intellectuals!

This is CLASSIC and blatant deflection at its finest. I mean, why bother with a valid debate that has actual merit and substance, really? Race trumps everything according to the left – including both logic and reason. It trumps real debate about real issues at hand. What I’d like Mr. Carter to tell me is exactly HOW the healthcare legislation will be paid for. Not the rhetoric B.S., but specific data. I’ve yet to receive that from the administration, so it’d be a wee bit helpful at this point. I’d also like for him to tell me how wonderful and law-abiding ACORN is, and how the seven Senators who chose to keep giving funds to them are not sexist and complete criminals themselves by association (for condoning the prostitution and abuse of underage girls to make money for the advancement of the Democratic party). I’d like for him to tell me why he believes Van Jones should have kept his job. I’d like for him to tell me that Obama is doing the right things when it comes to national security. I’d like for him to tell me when and where Obama has kept his hopey-changey campaign promises. I’d like for him to tell me all of these things and much, much more. In fact, I’ve asked for this ad nauseum – from liberals who write into us and scream emotional responses to posts – without any clear data to support why Obama is doing such a bang-up job. But, lo and behold, I’ve never received responses from those screaming people. Instead, I’ll get just more of the stock, emotional, fingerpointing responses that have nothing to do with any of the issues at hand.

Empty rhetoric doesn’t pay my power bills, Mr. Carter. Nor does it keep my husband and I in our jobs. Nor does it keep my family safe from terrorists. Nor does it mean jack CRAP when all is said and done. Much like the color of someone’s skin. Huh.

When “racist!” is spewed, the conversation is over. And, right now, this is what Democrats want. Because their arguments – or the lack thereof – are LAME. They want everyone to stop pointing out the flaws of the administration – the gaping HOLES in the legislation. The absolute vagueness. So, what are they doing? They’re deflecting, then feeding off the emotional responses of people in this country by screaming, “You’re a racist if you don’t like what we’re doing right now!”

All because I don’t like the policies of a man (who is just as much white as he is black, by the way). By Democratic deflection, I’m a racist. Interesting how that works.

I believe this is going to become embarrassing for the Democrats who have nothing of substance to say. For me, that point is already here. Way to keep elevating the discourse. I would’ve expected much more from a former leader of the free world, but I guess my expectations were a bit too high. Go figure.

Broward County Florida – The Pillar Of Premier, Taxpayer-Funded Public Schooling (NOT)

Published by Daisy on September 7, 2009 in Really?. 11 Comments Tags: , , , , , .

You know that whole Obama indcotrination address speech that’ll happen tomorrow in your kids’ public school? Well, in a lot of schools across the country, the administrators are giving parents the ultimate choice as to whether or not they want their kids subjected. In my stepson’s high school, for example, parents are allowed to write a note to “opt-out” their child if they deem it necessary to do so. My stepson will be staying in school tomorrow for the hour it airs. And, he’ll watch it – but as I’ve said in previous posts, we’ve discussed Obama’s policies enough in my home for him to know that pretty much 99% of what he will say will be a pile of steaming monkey poo. Plus, he’ll more than likely be texting 46 different peers during the hour-long narcissistic-fest anyway – which will really be helping to perpetuate his education and all. Thanks, Bo!

But in Broward County, Florida, they are REQUIRING students to watch it. Forcing them, even. Love that democracy (not to mention your taxpayer dollars) in action!

Humble and modest Broward County Superintendent, James F. Notter, spewed the following explanation for the absolute lack of choice he’s providing his students and their parents:

“As one of the premier major school systems in America, we have consistently encouraged civics education in the broadest sense, e.g., Kids Voting, elected officials participating in Career Days, countywide broadcast of Inaugural address, etc.,” said Notter. “Therefore, providing for a separation from this Address does not align with our practices and responsibility to provide a well rounded, quality education for all students. This is the first time an American President has spoken directly to students on the importance of education and the challenge to work hard, set educational goals, and take responsibility for one’s learning.”

From what I’ve read out there in Internet-land, this district is one of the most liberal in our country. And that whole “premier” thing? I think I saw several Broward County schools at the bottom of the barrel in statewide rankings, but that’s neither here nor there, right?

Today, I’m just happy that I don’t live in Florida.

You know what all this school speech stuff reminds me of? That creepy video of those little kids singing about Obama and change and crap during the election. The Pyongyang remix, of course (SHUDDER):