Advertisement

Tag Archive for 'george will'

LOVE.

While he continues to insist that he won’t be running for President in 2012, Our Man Mitch keeps getting attention from the national press about just how good he’d be if he changed his mind.

George Will is, I think it’s safe to say, a Mitch fan.  In his latest article, his lead paragraph is, in fact, as follows:

In 2013, when President Mitch Daniels, former Indiana governor, is counting his blessings, at the top of his list will be the name of his vice president: Paul Ryan. The former congressman from Wisconsin will have come to office with ideas for steering the federal government to solvency.”

OMG – that could be my ultimate dream team.  Can you even imagine the awesomeness?

Granted, the bulk of the article is about Paul Ryan – more so than about Mitch, but it’s pitch perfect all the same.  Will describes Ryan’s Roadmap, which includes tax reform, a reduction of our debt, retirement security, and healthcare reform.   And the more I read about the Roadmap, the more I like it.  Ryan wants to eliminate taxes on stuff like capital gains and death.  He wants to reduce the corporate income tax, which is crippling US businesses and driving them overseas.  Ryan wants to use refundable tax credits to help people buy portable health insurance coverage in any state.  He wants to encourage more use of medical savings accounts, which more closely resemble auto insurance plans than they do the common PPO-type health insurance option many people have grown far too accustomed to.  He wants to let workers decide if they want to invest part of their social security tax in personal retirement accounts.

I mean, it just makes sense, you guys.  Particularly when you compare Ryan’s Roadmap to what Will describes as the Democratic  ” impenetrable labyrinth of health care legislation.”

Daniels/Ryan 2012.  It’s my ultimate Presidential/VP ticket fantasy.

20,000 Fly Across The World In Fuel-Guzzling Jets To Discuss Man Made Climate Change

I love George Will’s most recent article about the whole climate change hoax. In it, he breaks down what Obama intends to do in terms of reducing emissions.

He says, “Barack Obama, understanding the histrionics required in climate-change debates, promises that U.S. emissions in 2050 will be 83 percent below 2005 levels. If so, 2050 emissions will equal those in 1910, when there were 92 million Americans. But there will be 420 million Americans in 2050, so Obama’s promise means that per capita emissions then will be about what they were in 1875. That. Will. Not. Happen.”

Is it just me, or is anyone else just dumbfounded by the people who are still convinced that we need to take any action, drastic or otherwise, to make an impact on the climate? If there is one constant certainty, it’s the CLIMATE FREAKING CHANGES. It always has. As the article points out, “From millennia before the Medieval Warm Period (800 to 1300), through the Little Ice Age (1500 to 1850), and for millennia hence, climate change is always a 100 percent certainty. Skeptics doubt that the scientists’ models, which cannot explain the present, infallibly map the distant future.”

To add insult to the already injured alarmists, things in Denmark, where they already have a cap and trade plan in place, aren’t going so well. There’s apparently a big scandal brewing there which involves massive fraud in the “trading” part of cap and trade. And that’s because, as people with Actual Brains have realized forever, this whole hoax is nothing but a money-making venture for people like Al Gore and his ardent followers.

But, you know, let’s go ahead and have the big Copenhagen meeting and fly thousands of people in and pollute the skies and stuff. That seems like a good idea.

2009-12-05 17 07 59

NEA And Obama, Sitting In A Tree…

Here’s the call that George was referring to:

Ruh-roh. This isn’t going to go over well.

Fasten your seatbelts, folks. This is going to be fun to watch! Especially like two weeks from now, which is when the MSM will finally pick up on it. Meantime, watch Fox tonight!

P.S. I wonder if this “artist” (apparently a soap star) was asked by the NEA to wear this dress to the Emmy’s yesterday?

2009-09-21_123159