Ah yes, the environmental wackadoodles. They have their own little craaaaaazy corner market on WACK.
Take Professor Richard Parncutt, for example. He's an Austrian dude who believes that global warming deniers should get the death penalty. No, I'm not kidding.
You can read his little manifesto here (this original version has since been taken down and replaced with an edited one - see link below), or you can save yourself the agony and just read the following paragraphs, which are my favorite excerpts:
In this article, I am going to suggest that the death penalty is an appropriate punishment for influential GW deniers. But before coming to this surprising conclusion, please allow me to explain where I am coming from.
I have always been opposed to the death penalty in all cases, and I have always supported the clear and consistent stand of Amnesty International on this issue. The death penalty is barbaric, racist, expensive, and it is often applied by mistake. Apparently, it does not even act as a deterrent to would-be murderers. Hopefully, the USA and China will come to their senses soon
Even mass murderers should not be executed, in my opinion. Consider the politically motivated murder of 77 people in Norway in 2011. Of course the murderer does not deserve to live, and there is not the slightest doubt that he is guilty. But if the Norwegian government killed him, that would just increase the number of dead to 78. It would not bring the dead back to life. In fact, it would not achieve anything positive at all. I respect the families and friends of the victims if they feel differently about that. I am simply presenting what seems to me to be a logical argument.
GW deniers fall into a completely different category from Behring Breivik. They are already causing the deaths of hundreds of millions of future people. We could be speaking of billions, but I am making a conservative estimate.
I love the introductory paragraph so much. "Hi, I'm Professor Wackadoodle. I'm going to write a really lame and sans-actual-data research paper about how I want to kill people. Because I'm batcrap crazy. Yay."
Not surprisingly, Professor Wackadoodle edited his little manifesto, too - for Christmas, no less. I mean, nothing says "Happy Birthday, Jesus!" like a manifesto to off a bunch of global warming deniers. Awwwww yeah. If you're so inclined and also enjoy stabbing yourself in the eyes with forks just for giggles, you can read that here.
Here's what I've learned about Professor Wackadoodle and his band of merry environmental moonbats:
1. This loon teaches people. TEACHES THEM. And someone PAYS for that instruction. Holy mother of frightening.
2. He doesn't believe in the death penalty - nope. He considers himself a "pacifist," yet wants folks who don't buy into global warming to, well, be murdered by the government. He's also is a contradictory moron and a liberal. But I repeat myself.
3. He is an intellectual who thinks he's elite and better than you, and therefore knows best, and since I, too, am skeptical of global warming, I would probably make his list of "people who should be killed."
The thing is, there are already lists out there of people that this freak speaks of....the "deniers" who are pegged as those he would like to be put on a little list of folks who decide that they aren't going to buy into the McManBearPig saga.
But back to number three. I have to say - I'd be lying if the thought of me being on a murder list created and deemed sane by a liberal pacifist somehow didn't amuse the ever-living crap out of me.
That is some twisted, mentally insane comic gold right there.
In all seriousness, though....
Bring it, Dick. Really.