Oh, how very theatrical of Dear Leader. Obama is going to use CHILDREN AS HIS BACKDROP tomorrow as he talks about all the wonderful little executive orders he's going to go through with - like the aspiring dictator he is - to trample our constitutional rights.
Yep. He's surrounding himself with children.
Neato.
President Obama is weighing as many as 19 different gun control measures that he could take without congressional approval, as he prepares to unveil a comprehensive plan on Wednesday to address gun violence amid claims from Republicans that he's overstepping his bounds.
The president plans to reveal the details of that plan shortly before noon on Wednesday, joined by children who wrote him letters on the issue, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said. Carney stressed that Obama believes a "significant" part of the plan would include congressional action, but declined to specify what actions the president might take via executive order.
During the final press conference of his first term, Obama said Monday that he will "vigorously pursue" the recommendations he received from the Vice President Biden-led task force.
It's yet unclear how many of the 19 different waysof taking a steaming crap on the Constitution options the president will actually go through with.
Because of COURSE it's unclear to him.
One of the biggest things on the table is a revisit to the "assault weapons ban." Which leads me to a loaded question (pun intended). Can some liberal out there please explain to me exactly what the HIZZELL an assault weapon really IS? Can you also tell me what a non-assault weapon is by contrast? And how a non-assault weapon somehow WON'T and CAN'T kill people?
Because the last time I checked, I can use ANY of the guns in my collection to assault someone or something if I choose to.
I don't know, though. Maybe the guns liberals have - the ones made of Skittles, rainbows, and unicorn farts - are somehow less capable of ASSAULTING things. I just don't OWN THOSE GUNS, apparently.
I'll wait over here while you work on that explanation, bleeding hearts.
On an upbeat note, it seems that there are still people in Washington who give a rat's assular area about the U.S. Constitution. (You remember that "little book," don't ya liberals?) Namely, Congress. Rep. Steve Stockman (R-TX, because of COURSE HE'S FROM TEXAS), who is "vowing to try to impeach Obama if he takes any action via executive order," as Dear Leader's actions are "an unconstitutional and unconscionable attack on the very founding principles of this republic."
A to the MEN.
Stockman went on to say, "I will seek to thwart this action by any means necessary, including, but not limited to, eliminating funding for implementation, defunding the White House, and even filing articles of impeachment."
But never mind all of that. Obama's going to use CHILDREN AS A BACKDROP in his little speech tomorrow.
It's always about the presentation, you know. Never waste a crisis. Or a good photo op.
Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go scrape my eyeballs off the back of my brain from rolling them so hard.
Please wait...
