Chicks on the Right
Chicks on the Right

Attention Townspeople!

We are currently in the process of upgrading servers and introducing a new design for the site!  Feel free to browse any of our old posts below (or using the search feature) - but if you are looking for our new content, head on over to:

Note that this is just a temporary landing spot for our new content and that you will soon see both old and new content together right here on!

Friday, 01 February 2013 18:47

Don't you see how similar they are?  Don't you?

This is just the dumbest argument ever - that a private employer might decide that due to his/her religious beliefs, he/she might decide not to cover LEUKEMIA. 
Here's the point that Sandra Fluke (and anyone moronic enough to believe she's credible) keeps missing.  You are not REQUIRED to work for a specific employer.  You are not REQUIRED to stay with an employer whose health plan you don't like.  You are not required to accept a position which provides benefits that are not satisfactory to you.  You have choices, people.  If you don't like the health plan your employer offers you, DON'T WORK for that employer.  There's this thing called the free market, whereby if enough people get pissed off at an employer for not providing something in their health plan that they want, the employer may be inclined to provide that something after all, simply to ensure that they find quality employees. 
But back to Sandra.  Sandra has now progressed from complaining about paying for $9 birth control pills to comparing contraception to leukemia.
Yup.  Those are the same.
Friday, 01 February 2013 11:34

Oh, thank GOODNESS for the wisdom of the Department of Homeland Security.

Now, WHERE are my scissors?

Friday, 01 February 2013 08:00

According to this, "The University of Michigan is accused of kicking an InterVarsity Christian Fellowship chapter off campus because the group requires its leaders to be Christians - an apparent violation of the university's non-discrimination policy."

Alrighty then.  Because I know that if I'm part of a Christian Fellowship, I totally want the leaders of said group to be Muslim.  Or Buddhist.  Or atheist.  That makes SO MUCH SENSE.

(Excuse me while my eyes touch the back of my brain for a minute.)

And then there's this clip, which provides a plethora of examples of how God is being censored all over this country of ours, where - you know - God shed his grace on us and all.  It shows just how much our society has become politically-correct morons:

Of course, liberals are making fun of folks like Todd Starnes and Fox News for pointing these stories out.  As evidenced by the title of mediaite's Andrew-something-or-others take on it, "Hide Your Bibles, Hide Your Kids, Because Muslims Are Coming!"
Lamest. Article title. EVER.
My favorite part of this hilarious piece of so-called American journalism is the directive that right wing wackjobs like myself "should probably clutch (our) pearls as hard as possible."  You're right, tolerant liberal.  We're all walking around with freaking pearls on, just clutching them in fear of Muslims.   According to you, we're also scared of black people and homosexuals and anyone who doesn't ALSO have pearls on too, right?  While you sit over there and stereotype, I'll play along.  That patchouli cologne of yours goes nicely with that hint of chai latte wafting from your free hand.  You know, the hand that's not clutching some just-released Apple product that allows you to communicate with your crapping-on-cop-cars-unbathed-Occupy-buddies about how much you hate those eeeeeeeeeeeeevil corporations. And your disdain for people who wear pearls.
I'll wait over here for a minute while you ponder that and dude-brood over your unused Master's degree in Women's Studies.  Just let me know if you need a tampon or anything, hippie.
Anywho. Back to God being censored.  It's happening.  And those on the left LOOOVE this kind of story, because they see it as a way to paint us all as paranoid wackjobs when we say that people's RIGHTS TO PRACTICE RELIGION FREELY are being trampled on, but it just seems to be happening more and more to Christians.  Never mind that "a little girl wrote a Veterans Day poem in honor of her grandfather who served in the war.  She had a passing reference to God.  The school district ordered her to remove that word."  Nah.  It may be "indefensible" to most people, but liberals are still going to use it as a way to paint Muslims somehow as the victims here.  
I need to go get some more pearls, y'all.  Mine are just so worn out from all that clutching.
Friday, 01 February 2013 07:32

According to this, Obama was being photographed yesterday for a spread in Vogue magazine. 

You might recall from our end of 2012 recap video that Daisy and Vogue magazine go together like peas and carrots (start at the 1.18 minute mark):

But I'm thinking even DAISY might be canceling her subscription if she has to see Obama in a Vogue photo spread.
From the sourcelink, this is by far my favorite tweet on the subject:
Meanwhile, the jobs council has been disbanded, our debt is out of control, we're being threatened by Al Qaeda, and gas prices are creeping up to $4 again. 
And Obama is doing a photo shoot for Vogue.  Because PRIORITIES.
Thursday, 31 January 2013 22:10

So this happened last night on Twitter:

Now, in case you're wondering what I linked her to above, it was this earlier column we wrote about how hilariously hypocritical it is for liberals to call us lesbians as an insult. Liberals hate that article, because it exposes their own homophobia and bigotry.

And the conversation continued.

And that link goes to this:

So there you have it.  This is what you get to deal with when you're a couple of outspoken conservative chicks.  YAY US! wink

And once we blocked her account, she proceeded to blast us with other accounts, filled with the same kind of vulgar language and useless, pointless hysteria.  Those acounts were blocked as well.

This is how liberals spend their time. They can't debate logically, so they just start sites like the one featured above.  She knew she lost the battle about the lesbian thing, and she hated that.  So the response?  Vulgar hysterical lunacy.


Thursday, 31 January 2013 08:24

Unbelievable - the depths to which the left will sink.


Seriously - how do these people sleep at night? How?

Thursday, 31 January 2013 08:03

Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi hates Jews.   Hates them.  Wants them blown off the face of the earth.  


I mean, you can't get more hateful than calling Jewish people "apes and pigs."  Which he did, in addition to using the word 'bloodsuckers."  While spewing all of this vitriol, he so effortlessly threw in a few jabs about how much he hates America, too.  And, most recently - like the tolerant and compassionate Muslim brotherhood guy that he is -  one of Morsi's right hand dudes was recently quoted as saying that the Holocaust was a big ol' hoax.  

Because of COURSE he and his buddies think it was a hoax.

Fathi Shihab Eddim, Morsi’s senior aide, made the comments on Holocaust Remembrance Day on Jan. 27. “The myth of the Holocaust is an industry that America invented,” Eddim said, according to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency.

As if THAT wasn't enough to want to punch Egyptian leadership square in the face, Morsi also forced a Shariah-law-compliant "Constitution" on the Egyptian people. Which jails and abuses Christians.  You know.  No biggie.

YAY freedom, huh?

But wait - there's more.  Because this is the age of the Obama administration, so of course there's more head-shaking crap to be utterly disgusted about.

After knowing ALL OF THE ABOVE, Obama is giving Morsi and his Israel-hating jackwagons TWENTY F -16s and 200 Abrams battle tanks, just for giggles. Didn't bat an eye over it, actually.  Out of the goodness of American taxpayers' hearts. that is.  So sweet of him.

Americans may be shocked to learn that despite all the talk about Israel being our number one ally in the Middle East, the delivery of 200 Abrams tanks and 20 more F-16′s to Egypt will give the Egyptians more American made advanced fighters than Israel. If Obama truly wants peace in the Middle East, why is he sending more jets and tanks to Egypt, plus 48 billion dollars worth of weapons to ultra Islamist Saudi Arabia; home of 15 of the 19 terrorists who destroyed the World Trade Center on 9/11.

Translation?  The current administration is FULL OF CRAP when they say that Israel is our number one ally.  Yet liberals continue to guzzle the Kool-Aid and think otherwise, despite the BLATANT PROOF.

Israel has been attacked by Egypt and other Arab nations five times since 1948. The Jewish State has been struck by more than 12,000 rockets in the last decade, deliberately fired on civilian population centers. Jewish infants have been decapitated in their cradles by Palestinian terrorists and the Israeli Olympic team was slaughtered by the PLO at the Munich Olympics. That attack was funded by Abu Mazin, now known as Mahmoud Abbas, the President of the Palestinian Nation Authority and Israel’s so-called partner for peace.

Never mind all that terrorism stuff, you meanies.  Never mind that our current administration is literally handing over powerful weapons to a country that hates Jews AND Americans.  Never mind all of that.  It didn't matter when they handed weapons over to Mexican drug cartels.  It didn't matter when they deflected from the real terrorist attack in Benghazi and blamed it on a YouTube video.  After all, what DIFFERENCE does that make, right?

I suppose, since Obama is so gung-ho on people's rights and whatnot, he'll be giving Christians and American taxpayers and every woman who's ever been oppressed and abused by Shariah Law a phone call.  I mean, they HAVE to be as important to reach out to as a 30-year old law student who can't afford $9 birth control from Wal-Mart, yes?



Thursday, 31 January 2013 07:46


I don't know about you all, but when Al Qaeda is promising that they are currently planning attacks that will be "strong, serious, alarming, earth-shattering, shocking and terrifying,” and that the strikes will be "group and lone-wolf operations, in addition to the use of booby-trapped vehicles," then they don't particularly sound all that decimated.

Meanwhile, the guy Obama wants as defense secretary, Chuck Hagel, has been accused by conservatives of having "soft-line views on Iran, hostility toward Israel, and support for cuts in the military and nuclear forces." 

Perfect.  It makes PERFECT SENSE that we should have someone like that in charge of DEFENDING us against terror, doesn't it?


Thursday, 31 January 2013 07:42

So, you know France is a socialist utopia that's literally driving its citizens to run FAR FAR AWAY due to its 75% high-income tax rate?  And you know how their leaders just can't understand why taxing-and-spending does NOT FREAKING WORK?

To put it bluntly, France is bankrupt.

"Data from the Bank of France shows capital investment is leaving the country every day. Rating agencies Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s have both already removed France’s once-coveted AAA credit.

The President is currently trying to revive France's economic fortunes by cutting spending by the equivalent of more than £51billion."


To try to combat being broke, not only is he planning to raise taxes even MORE over the next five years like a drunken sorority girl on spring break with her Daddy's credit card, but French President Hollande has recently had the brilliant idea of making everyone shut their lights off. 

No.  I'm not kidding:

The ‘bankrupt’ French government yesterday set out a law forcing all non-residential buildings to turn off their lights at night in a bid to save £600million a year.


From July 1, interior lights will have to be turned off within an hour of the last person leaving the premises, while all exterior lights and shop fronts will have to be plunged into darkness by 1am.


The new law, which is also aimed at cutting back on CO2 emissions, comes just days after a senior  member of President Francois Hollande’s Socialist government said the country was ‘totally bankrupt’'.  

...Environment Minister Delphine Batho said it would also make France a pioneer in Europe in preventing light pollution, which disrupts ecosystems and people's sleep patterns.'



But they're going to make some exceptions for Christmas decorations, because they're sweet like that.

Dumb AND green.  But I repeat myself.

Ah yes, everyone.  Behold the SUCK that is socialism.  Now in the dark!



Wednesday, 30 January 2013 20:20

So many of you have sent in messages of support and offers to help in response to our earlier post about our book endeavor.

I'm just overwhelmed, really. It's all just incredibly humbling and I've been sort of weepy about it all day, because the messages just keep pouring in.

You guys realize we're total dorks, right? smiley

Anyway, I haven't had time to get through even a fraction of the messages, but opened one that had the subject line of "Mailing List, Congratulations, and a Proposition" and was intrigued enough to click through to the body of the message.  And when I read it?  TOTALLY BAWLED.  I asked for permission to share it, and he obliged.  And I just know y'all are going to feel the same sense of hopefulness for the country that I did when I read it.  And you're going to be in LOVE with this precious young man.


Dear Daisy and Mock, My name is J.M. and I am an 18 year-old college student at Southern Methodist University in Dallas, Texas. I have been following your page on Facebook since its inception (I remember when y'all were excited to get 5,000 likes). Because I was a mere 14 year-old freshmen in high school when I discovered your page, you have had a major impact on shaping my conservative beliefs and for that I will be forever grateful. The thing is, I was born and raised in the San Francisco Bay Area in California, so conservative role-models other than my parents were few and far between. When I saw something on the news that confused me, I turned to you; when a teacher presented a one-sided liberal opinion as fact, I turned to you; when I got in debates with friends, I turned to you; but most importantly, when I needed a boost in morale about my fellow Americans, I turned to you. I cannot even begin to tell you how excited I am for you to take your venture to the next level and not only spread conservatism, but more importantly show America women's increasingly important role in the our mission as conservatives to make this nation the best, strongest, wealthiest, happiest nation that it can be. Strong, conservative, capitalist, hard-working women like you are the definition of feminism, and I mean that with the utmost respect and admiration.

On another note, I started thinking about ways for you to spread the word about your book. Expanding on the "state reps" idea, I think that you should also have college reps. With your ever-growing Facebook community I am sure that you could find college students across the country that would love to represent you on their campuses, me being your first volunteer. Your book would be a great way to reach a major voting bloc that tends to sway liberal due to misinformation, and at the very least present them with information that their liberal professors or parents never have before. College is the time where we are still in limbo between childhood and adulthood, so this is an opportune moment to positively influence future generations of Americans. As a college rep, I could hold book-launch parties, book clubs, advertise, and maybe even host a signing. I know that there are a lot of logistics to something like this that need to be worked out, but just thought I would throw the idea out there.

Congratulations on your newest venture, I cannot wait to see its impact!

All the best,



That's our future, folks. And it's a bright one. smiley

Wednesday, 30 January 2013 11:23

If there’s anything Daisy and I have learned after nearly four years of running this website, it’s that if you work your assular area off, you’re eventually rewarded.

We’ve definitely worked our assular areas off.  No question about that.  And our reward so far has been the development of our wonderful community. We are MEGA PROUD of that, and are thankful every day that you’re in the fight with us.  But even as our community has grown, we’ve always hoped for more – more ways to reach more people, more ways to help give conservatism a makeover, more opportunity to have an impact.

And now it's time to let you in on some exciting news. This past fall, we had the good fortune of being contacted by a literary agent, who we signed with in December and who is helping us develop our first ever book.  We will be looking to you all in the coming weeks for your help with ideas of how to connect us with your local GOP/conservative networks to promote the book, we’ll be asking for folks to contact us if they are interested in being COTR “state reps” and hosting book club parties in early 2014, and we’ll be giving you more information along the way.  Our theme?  Well, we gave you a hint with this video:

We’ll be taking a deeper dive into feminism, how that term has been too long associated with liberals, and how we intend to give feminism a conservative makeover. 

We’re stoked about it, and hope y’all will be stoked to read it once it’s published.  We’ll be posting updates on our facebook page, and if you’d like to be on our mailing list for some you-heard-it-first updates, please send an email to with the subject line “Mailing list.”  No worries – we’ll never spam or sell your information.

Thanks for being on this journey with us!  More news about that and other fun things in the works to come!

Wednesday, 30 January 2013 08:33

These people are so full of crap, their eyes are brown.

Oh wait - I said brown.  I must be raaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaacist.

Nope.  I'm not racist.  Just a "crazy cracker" - well, according to this lemming, anyway. Good to know.

Thanks for keeping it "civil" and "tolerant" once again, liberals!

Wednesday, 30 January 2013 07:22

BEHOLD: Steve Kroft explaining why Obama favors 60 minutes:

"...I think he likes '60 Minutes.' It’s, you know, we have a huge audience. We have a format that suits him, it's long. We can do 12 minutes or 24 minutes. We do, you know, we do a good job of editing. And I’ve been doing these interviews with him since a few weeks before he declared his candidacy. So I covered him during the campaign and have kept doing it in the White House.

But I think it's a question of fairness. We have not -- I think he knows that we're not going to play gotcha with him, that we're not going to go out of our way to make him look bad or stupid and we'll let him answer the questions.
I don't know if y'all have ever seen these interviews Obama does with Kroft, but they are the lamest interviews EVER.  So, I can translate Steve's quote above pretty easily:  "We edit out anything that could potentially make Obama look bad.  We never make him answer for his mistakes.  We do not ask questions that his detractors want answers to."
OF COURSE he'll continue to interview with 60 Minutes.  Hello.
Tuesday, 29 January 2013 11:30

In case you're new here, I'm a Midwestern girl who was raised in the South.  I attended the University of Tennessee for undergrad school, and I have a soft spot for SEC football and sweet tea as a result (yes, SUGAR IN MY TEA...suck it, Bloomberg).

Now that we have my love for all things Volunteer State established, you'll understand my newfound appreciation for Marsha Blackburn (R-TN).  

You see, the other day, Obama was talking about how he's a big ol' skeet shooter - you know, in addition to hating the Second Amendment for the REST of us lowly minions and all.

And in response to that declaration?  In line with a lot of folks, Rep. Blackburn is a bit skeptical of this apparent shooting prowess.  So, like any good southern girl would do, she's calling his bluff:


"If he is a skeet shooter, why have we not heard of this? Why have we not seen photos? Why hasn't he referenced this at any point in time?" Blackburn said Monday on CNN's "Erin Burnett OutFront."

"I tell you what I do think," she later added. "I think he should invite me to Camp David, and I'll go skeet shooting with him and I bet I'll beat him."

Y'all have no idea how much I LOVE THIS.  And how I'm currently waiting with happy, smiley anticipation as to whether or not Obama will accept the challenge that Blackburn has thrown in his direction.  

With all the talk coming out of his mouth about safety in sports and whatnot, I'm eagerly anticipating seeing him in his Mom jeans and cycling helmet if he accepts said challenge.  After all, one can never be too careful when a chick is about to school you.  

Rep. Blackburn is my favorite Chick on the Right o' the day.

You go on, girl.


Tuesday, 29 January 2013 06:30

Behold the following video, which shows the Seattle Police Department holding its first gun buyback since the 1990s.  They offered folks $100 and $200 gift cards in exchange for their guns, with the intention of taking said guns, destroying them, and using them for local construction projects.  

Also behold the enterprising gun enthusiasts, who basically turned it into a makeshift gun show, offering donuts and MORE money to sellers.

Here's the thing, y'all.  If these people knew anything about guns, they'd know that the rifles and shotguns they're getting $100 for and the semi-automatic rifles they're getting $200 for - with a weeee bit of research, they'd find that said weapons are worth WAAAAAAY more than a freakin' Amazon gift card.  Some of the guns were considered parts of history, for crying out loud.  

So it's probably for the best that these people ARE ridding themselves of said weapons, frankly.

Free market capitalism and ingenuity are still alive and kicking.  Who knew?

Monday, 28 January 2013 21:59

Guess what!  According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, union membership as a percentage of the workforce has fallen to the LOWEST LEVEL EVER since the 1930s.

I don’t know about you all, but I see that as seriously awesome news.  The percentage dropped from 11.8% to 11.3%.  It makes sense, because as more and more states (like our great state of Indiana) become Right To Work states, fewer and fewer people with Actual Brains have interest in belonging to unions and paying union dues.  For all the screaming they do about being “pro-choice,” liberals sure seem to hate it when workers have the CHOICE of whether or not to belong to a money-grubbing union.  And now that Indiana workers DO have that choice, union membership has fallen by 56,000.  Whaddya know!

The other reason for the decline in membership?  Companies with big unions being forced to shut down – like Hostess.  And if you have been around COTR for awhile, I think you know what we have to say about that.  HO Hos, bitches! (If you need the history on where that phrase came from, click here.)

Meanwhile, I’m kinda loving the handy dandy data chart which shows the unions’ steady decline. Perhaps that 1%’er that liberals never dare criticize, Richard Trumka, will have to give up some of his mega salary in order to keep those Democratic party contributions going at the level he’d like.

It’s been a crap week for unions.  First, it turns out that Obama made a bunch of illegal appointments to the NLRB, and now this?


Monday, 28 January 2013 21:36

Emotional, powerful testimony from a father who understands what it means to parent.

Monday, 28 January 2013 12:29

Let's talk about the story of Danny Creamer and Gina Allan.   They're a 20 and 18-year old (respectively) living in the UK and living OFF their fellow citizens hard earned money.

I'll preamble this post with the fact that this type of story really, REALLY pisses me off.

Mainly because - like most of you - I work my keester off every day, have been working since I was 14 years old, and I would never dream of taking absolute advantage of other people like this. It's something I can't even WRAP MY BRAIN AROUND.  And I simply do NOT understand when it became acceptable - gloat-worthy, even - to be on assistance or welfare of any shape or form.

Here's the most disturbting and symbolic part of their story.  They believe that they're entitled to live off taxpayers.  They truly BELIEVE it.  In fact, they believe that they're entitled to MORE than what they currently get.

Gina said, "We don't feel ashamed for being on benefits. Neither of us have the slightest bit of guilt towareds the taxpayers as both of our parents have been paying into the system for the last 30 years."

You hear that?  Their PARENTS have paid taxes, so they're ENTITLED to live for free, y'all.  Mom and Dad did the work so they don't have to, you see?

She continued:

"So we are just getting back our parents' huge contributions.  The fault lies with the system, not us.  There's just no incentive to find work when we've got a better lifestyle than if we were to go out and work for 35-40 hours every week.  Why would we give this up?"

And I hate to say it, but Gina is correct - completely dead ON - in the preceding paragraph.  Why WOULD they work, when everyone is supplying them with not just everything they NEED - but with a 47" television, freaking leather couches, manicured nails, a fake tan, and awesome clothing and toys for their infant daughter?


This is what's wrong with welfare, everyone.  THIS.  And while it may be a story from the U.K., there are stories just like it every day in the U.S.  Since Obama's been in office, our own welfare programs have grown by 19%.  "Since Fiscal Year 2009, federal and state welfare spending has risen from $779.9 billion to $927.2 billion."  Roughly ONE TRILLION BUCKS A YEAR is spent on welfare recipients, you guys.   Unchecked.  Unaccountable in many cases.

And we wonder why we're going bankrupt.  

Now, before you bleeding hearts come after me and label me a heartless meanie right-wing nut who hates the poor, that is not the point of this post.  The point lies with the thought process (or lack thereof) of the couple described above and their blatant - almost smug - abuse of the system.  

The point is the entitlement mentality - a liberal-progressive one - that has obviously been an absolute CANCER to the U.K. and is also metastasized in the United States.

Sick. And. Twisted.

Monday, 28 January 2013 10:07

OMG.  This is the most preposterous thing I have ever read.

A couple, out of the goodness of their hearts, tries to save an injured baby deer.  And the consequence?  They're facing a possible 60 years in jail.


13 WTHR Indianapolis

This is in OUR FREAKING STATE. A petition has been started to help the couple. See it right here.



Monday, 28 January 2013 09:13

Louis Michael Seidman, Professor of Constitutional Law at Georgetown University (because of COURSE he's a Constitutional Law professor at Georgetown) was on Charles Osgood's Sunday morning show yesterday, bashing the constitution as "outdated."

And yeah, these two guys MUST know a thing or two about outdated, as evidenced by the bow-tie and obligatory-liberal- professorial beard.  

But I digress.

THIS is the kind of person who's teaching Constitutional law, everyone.   And it's a big reason that I fear for the future of this exceptional country of ours.

Your Monday morning dose of WACK, everyone.

Wanna donate to COTR?